This is a very simple sample problem from ISI MStat PSB 2012 Problem 10. It's a very basic problem but very important and regular problem for statistics students, using one of the most beautiful theorem in Point Estimation. Try it!
Let \(X_1,X_2,.....X_{10}\) be i.i.d. Poisson random variables with unknown parameter \(\lambda >0\). Find the minimum variance unbiased estimator of exp{\(-2\lambda \)}.
Poisson Distribution
Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimators
Lehman-Scheffe's Theorem
Completeness and Sufficiency
Well, this is a very straight forward problem, where we just need to verify certain conditions, of sufficiency and completeness.
If, one is aware of the nature of Poisson Distribution, one knows that for a given sample \(X_1,X_2,.....X_{10}\), the sufficient statistics for the unknown parameter \(\lambda>0\), is \(\sum_{i=1}^{10} X_i \) , also by extension \(\sum_{i}X_i\) is also complete for \(\lambda\) (How??).
So, now first let us construct an unbiased estimator of \(e^{-2\lambda}\). Here, we need to observe patterns as usual. Let us define an Indicator Random variable,
\(I_X(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & X_1=0\ and\ X_2=0 \\ 0 & Otherwise \end{cases}\),
So, \(E(I_X(x))=P(X_1=0, X_2=0)=e^{-2\lambda}\), hence \(I_X(x)\) is an unbiased estimator of \(e^{-2\lambda}\). But is it a Minimum Variance ??
Well, Lehman-Scheffe answers that, Since we know that \(\sum X_i\) is complete and sufficient for \(\lambda \), By Lehman-Scheffe's theorem,
\(E(I_X(x)|\sum X_i=t)\) is the minimum variance unbiased estimator of \(e^{-2\lambda }\) for any \(t>0\). So, we need to find the following,
\(E(I_X(x)|\sum_{i=1}^{10}X_i=t)= \frac{P(X_1=0,X_2; \sum_{i}X_i=t)}{P(\sum_{i=3}^{10}X_i=t)}=\frac{e^{-2\lambda}e^{-8\lambda}\frac{(8\lambda)^t}{t!}}{e^{10\lambda}\frac{(10\lambda)^t}{t!}}=(\frac{8}{10})^t\).
So, the Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimator of exp{\(-2\lambda\)} is \((\frac{8}{10})^{\sum_{i=1}^{10}X_i}\)
Now can you generalize this for a sample of size n, again what if I defined \(I_X(x)\) as,
\(I_X(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & X_i=0\ &\ X_j=0 \\ 0 & Otherwise \end{cases}\), for some \(i \neq j\),
would it affected the end result ?? What do you think?
Let's not end our concern for Poisson, and think further, that for the given sample if the sample mean is \(\bar{X}\) and sample variance is \(S^2\). Can you show that \(E(S^2|\bar{X})=\bar{X}\), and further can you extend your deductions to \( Var(S^2) > Var(\bar{X}) \) ??
Finally can you generalize the above result ?? Give some thoughts to deepen your insights on MVUE.
In 2026, the following Cheenta students have been successful for Indian Statistical Institute's M.Stat Entrance. They ranked within the first 50 in the entire country in these entrances. I.S.I. M.Stat Entrance
In 2026, the following Cheenta students have been successful for Indian Statistical Institute's B.Stat Entrance and Chennai Mathematical Institute's B.Sc. Math Entrance. They ranked within the first 200 in the entire country in these entrances. Most of these students attended the problem solving workshops regularly, which happen 5 days every week. CMI B.Sc. Math Entrance […]
In 2025, 8 students from Cheenta Academy cracked the prestigious Regional Math Olympiad. In this post, we will share some of their success stories and learning strategies. The Regional Mathematics Olympiad (RMO) and the Indian National Mathematics Olympiad (INMO) are two most important mathematics contests in India.These two contests are for the students who are […]
Cheenta Academy proudly celebrates the success of 27 current and former students who qualified for the Indian Olympiad Qualifier in Mathematics (IOQM) 2025, advancing to the next stage — RMO. This accomplishment highlights their perseverance and Cheenta’s ongoing mission to nurture mathematical excellence and research-oriented learning.
