Solution:
Diagram
Given: ABC be any triangle. AD, BE and CF are drawn from A, B, C to BC, CA and AB respectively such that they concur at K and $latex (\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{BF}{FA})$ and ∠ADB = ∠AFC.
R.T.P.: ∠ABE = ∠CAD;
Construction: FD is joined.
Proof:
Since ∠ADB = ∠AFC;
hence 180° - ∠BFC = ∠ADB;
=> ∠BFC + ∠ADB = 180°;
=> BDKF is a cyclic quadrilateral (since sum of an opposite pair of angles 180°)
Hence ∠FBK = ∠FDK (angles in the segment FK in the cyclic quadrilateral BDKF) .... (i)
Since $latex (\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{BF}{FA})$
=> DF||AC
=> ∠FDA = ∠CAD (alternate angles)
Since by (i) ∠FBK = ∠FDK
=> ∠ABE = ∠FBK = ∠FDK = ∠FDA = ∠CAD;
=> ∠ABE = ∠CAD;
Q.E.D.
Solution:
Let $latex |(a_j - j )| = (t_j)$
If all the $latex t_j$ -s are different then they will take up each value from 0 to 2010 (included) exactly once.
squaring both sides and adding all terms we get
$latex (a_1^2 + a_2^2 + ... + a_{2011}^2 + 1^2 + 2^2 + ... 2011^2 = 2 a_1 1 + 2 a_2 2 + ... + 2 a_{2011} 2011 + (0^2 + 1^2 + ... + 2010^2))$
The left hand side of the equality is even and the right side is odd. Hence all the numbers from 0 to 2010 cannot appear as values of the 2011 $latex t_j$ -s. Hence there must be repetitions.
Proved.
Solution:
The the two consecutive squares be $latex (m^2) and ((m+1)^2)$.
=> n - k = $latex (m^2)$ ... (i)
n + ℓ = $latex ((m+1)^2)$ ... (ii)
Adding (i) and (ii) we have (n+ ℓ) + (n-k) = (m^2 + m^2 + 2m + 1)
=> 2n + ℓ - k = $latex (2m^2 + 2m + 1)$
=> ℓ - k = $latex (2m^2 + 2m + 1 - 2n)$ --- (iii)
Now(n-k)(n+ℓ) = $latex (m^2 \times (m+1)^2)$
Hence $latex ((m^2 + m)^2)$= $latex (n^2)$ + nℓ - nk - ℓk
= $latex (n^2)$ + n(ℓ-1+1) - nk - ℓk
= $latex (n^2)$ + n(ℓ-1) - nk + n - ℓk
= n(n + ℓ - 1 - k) + n - ℓk
= n(n + ℓ - k - 1) + n - ℓk
=$latex n(n + 2(m^2) + 2m + 1 - 2n - 1)$ + n - ℓk .. (replacing ℓ - k by $latex (2m^2 + 2m + 1 - 2n)$ using --- (iii) )
Thus
n - ℓk
= $latex ((m^2 + m)^2 - n(2m^2 + 2m - n))$
$latex ((m^2 + m)^2 - 2n(m^2 + m) + n^2)$
n - ℓk = $latex (m^2 + m - n)^2)$
HENCE PROVED that n - ℓk is a perfect square.
Solution:
Diagram:
Given: ABC be a triangle. $latex (BB_1)$ and $latex (CC_1) $ respectively are the bisectors of ∠B and ∠C with $latex (B_1) $ on AC and $latex (C_1) $ on AB. Let E anf F be the feet of the perpendiculars drawn from A onto $latex (BB_1)$ and $latex (CC_1) $ respectively. Suppose D is the point at which the incircle of ABC touches AB.
Required to Proof: AD = EF;
Construction: Let $latex (BB_1)$ and $latex (CC_1) $ intersect at I which is then the incentre of the triangle. ID is the perpendicular dropped on AB from I. Then ID is an inradius. EF and AI are joined. Let O be the midpoint of AI. OD, OA, OE and OF are joined.
Proof:
∠ADI = ∠AEI (by given hypothesis both the right angles)
=> A, I, E, D concyclic (since angles subtended by the segment AI at D and E are equal)
=> Also AI is the diameter
Similarly A, I, E and F are concyclic.
But one and only one circle can pass through three non collinear points. Hence only one circle passes through A, I and E.
Hence all the five points A, I, E, D and F are on the same circle which has AI as the diameter.
Since O is the midpoint of AI and AI is the diameter; hence O is the center of the circle through A, D, E, I, F.
In triangle ΔOAD and ΔOEF
OD = OE (radii of the same circle)
OA = OF (radii of the same circle)
∠AOD = ∠EOF = 180° - A (proof of this claim follows)
Hence ΔOAD ≅ ΔOEF => AD = EF (HENCE PROVED)
Lemma
R.T.P.: ∠AOD = ∠EOF = 180° - ∠A
Proof: ∠AOD = 2∠AID (angle at the circumference is half the angle at the center).
Also ∠AID = 90° - ∠A/2 (since I is the incenter, AI bisects ∠A; hence in ΔADI, ∠ADI = 90°, ∠DAI = ∠A/2; remaining ∠AID = 90° - ∠A/2)
Hence ∠AOD = 2∠AID = 2(90° - ∠A/2) = 180° - ∠A -- (*)
Again in ΔIBC, ∠IBC = ∠B/2; ∠ICB = ∠C/2; hence remaining ∠BIC = 180° - (∠B/2+ ∠C/2) = 90° + ∠A/2; Hence ∠EIF = 90° + ∠A/2 (vertically opposite angles);
Hence ∠EAF = 90°- ∠A/2 (Since EAFI is a cyclic quadrilateral, sum of opposite angles ∠EIF and ∠EAF is 180°)
Thus ∠EOF = 2∠EAF = 180° - ∠A (Since angle at the center is twice the angle at the circumference) -- (**)
Hence from (*) and (**) we conclude ∠AOD = ∠EOF = 180° - ∠A
Q.E.D.
Solution:

In 2025, 8 students from Cheenta Academy cracked the prestigious Regional Math Olympiad. In this post, we will share some of their success stories and learning strategies. The Regional Mathematics Olympiad (RMO) and the Indian National Mathematics Olympiad (INMO) are two most important mathematics contests in India.These two contests are for the students who are […]

Cheenta Academy proudly celebrates the success of 27 current and former students who qualified for the Indian Olympiad Qualifier in Mathematics (IOQM) 2025, advancing to the next stage — RMO. This accomplishment highlights their perseverance and Cheenta’s ongoing mission to nurture mathematical excellence and research-oriented learning.

Cheenta students shine at the Purple Comet Math Meet 2025 organized by Titu Andreescu and Jonathan Kanewith top national and global ranks.

Celebrate the success of Cheenta students in the Stanford Math Tournament. The Unified Vectors team achieved Top 20 in the Team Round.
hey cheenta .... awesome post ..... BTW what do u expect the cutoff to be ? im expecting around 30
@shivnadimpalli ... the cutoff differs from state-to-state... where are you from?
the second problem is simple too: there are 2011 nos, and the difference between any two can range from 1 to 2010. hence, by pigeonhole principle, atleast the differences between two pairs of numbers should be the same. hence proved.:) i got 4 ques right. i hope i get selected!
@ vasudhaThe pigeon hole principle that you have applied does not work here. Think closely and you will see the glitch ... but thanks for responding ... keep in touch