TIFR 2013 problem 25 | Complete metric on (0,1)

Try this problem from TIFR 2013 Problem 25 based on Complete Metric on (0,1).

Question: TIFR 2013 problem 25

True/False?

There exists a complete metric on the open interval \((0,1)\) inducing the usual topology.

Hint:

Topologically, (0,1) can be made "equal" to \(\mathbb{R}\), which is a complete space with usual metric.

Discussion:

Suppose \(f:(0,1)\to \mathbb{R} \) be a homeomorphism. (Which we know exists). Define a new distance function \(d\) on \((0,1)\) as follows:

for any \(x,y \in (0,1) \), \(d(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)|\).

The fact that d is indeed a metric follows because we are essentially using Euclidean distance.

Hope: \( ((0,1),d) \) satisfies the condition of the statement.

Since \(f\) is a homeomorphism, the inverse function \(f^{-1}\) is continuous, which implies \(f\) takes open sets to open sets. And together with continuity, this implies that a set \(S\subset (0,1) \) is open in \((0,1)\) if and only if \(f(S)\) is open in \(\mathbb{R}\) which happens if and only if \(S\) is open in \(((0,1),d)\).

Therefore, \(S\subset (0,1) \) is open in \(0,1)\) (with respect to subspace topology) if and only if \(S\) is open in \(((0,1),d)\). This gives:

conclusion 1: \(((0,1),d)\) induces the usual topology.

Suppose \((x_n)\) is a Cauchy sequence in \(((0,1),d)\). That means, \(d(x_n,x_m) \to 0 \) as \(n,m \to \infty \). Which is same as \(|f(x_n)-f(x_m)| \to 0 \) as \(n,m \to \infty \). Now \((f(x_n))\) is a Cauchy sequence in \(\mathbb{R}\), therefore it has a limit \(y\) in \(\mathbb{R}\.

\(f(x_n) \to y \). By the continuity of \(f^{-1}\), \(x_n \to f^{-1}(y) \in (0,1) \). This gives:

conclusion 2:  \( ((0,1),d) \) is complete.

Remark: How do we know \((0,1)\) is homeomorphic with \(\mathbb{R}\)? Well there can be many homeomorphisms. Take any function which is "minus infinity" at 0 and "infinity" at 1. For example \(tan\) with some appropriate adjustments work. (Hint: shift \((0,1)\) to \( (-\pi /2,\pi /2) \) ).

Useful Links:

TIFR 2013 problem 23 | Complete-Not Compact

Try this problem 23 from TIFR 2013 named - Complete not compact.

Question: TIFR 2013 problem 23

True/False?

Let \(X\) be complete metric space such that distance between any two points is less than 1. Then \(X\) is compact.

Hint:

What happens if you take discrete space?

Discussion:

Discrete metric space as we know it doesn't satisfy the distance < 1 condition. But we can make slight changes to serve our purpose.

In \(X\) define \(d(x,y)=\frac{1}{2}\) if \(x\ne y\). Otherwise, \(d(x,x)=0\).

\(d\) is indeed a metric, and it gives the same discrete topology on \(X\). Namely, every set is open because every singleton is open. And therefore every set is closed.

We want \(X\) to be complete. If \(x_n\) is a sequence in \(X\) which is Cauchy, then taking \(\epsilon=\frac{1}{4}\) in the definition of Cauchy sequence, we conclude that the sequence is eventually constant.

Since the tail of the sequence is constant, the sequence converges (to that constant).

This shows that \(X\) is indeed Complete.

We don't want \(X\) to be compact. Not all \(X\) will serve that purpose, for example a finite set is always compact. We take a particular \(X=\mathbb{R}\).

Since singleton sets are open, if we cover \(X\) by all singleton sets, then that cover has no finite subcover. Hence \(X\) is not compact.

Therefore the given statement is False.

Some Useful Links